A book purchase that was an actual good selection for me, because quite frankly, in today's world, it's better to be educated than ignorant.
I have been on a very long losing streak as of late, when it comes to selecting books to read. Normally, when I decide to choose a book to read from my local public library, I have a set of rules that I follow in order to select a book to read.
- The front and back cover. If my curiosity is piqued, then;
- I open and read the inside blurb. If my curiosity is still piqued, then;
- I open to a random page and read. If my curiosity is still piqued, then;
- I check out the book.
However, if the book is non-fiction and if it's from a person that I am very familiar with (e.g. Eric Roberts has a memoir out), then I will skip my rules and simply choose the book.
The problem that has contributed to my current DNF streak is pretty basic: I am purchasing gently used books from my local library's used book/DVD/CD store, and they're being chosen by a completely different criteria, namely, it's about an interesting (at least to me) topic.
Unfortunately for me, choosing a book, usually non-fiction, by topic, has not translated to the book being an interesting read. Let me give you a few examples to show you exactly what I mean.
1} A book about a Victorian lady whose husband is a sea captain, sailing from England to Australia, from Australia to San Francisco, then San Francisco to Ireland, then from Ireland to home. Sounds interesting, right? Especially when the source material is a diary/journal that the lady in question kept throughout the trip. Unfortunately, the narrative was dry as dirt and because it was written by an academic, it felt like I was reading someone's master thesis. So I gave up after two weeks.
2} A book about the history of the London underworld. The title alone piqued my curiosity enough for me to purchase the book, and after discovering that the author in question wrote a series of books covering different facets of the London underworld, I was hooked. But, it soon became apparent that the author's biases were making themselves known throughout the book. Call me old fashioned, but I'm of the school of thought that when you write a non-fiction book, your biases should be kept under wraps. You should present a thoughtful interpretation of the events without your personal biases coloring your writing. This one I also gave up on after a few weeks.
In general, the past half dozen used books that I had purchased caused me to have buyer's remorse. Not so much losing money, as the price range of $2 to $4 (about 10% of the current cover price) was good and it was going to a good cause, but the fact that the topic mentioned on the cover did not live up to the hype whatsoever to what was between the covers.
I'm fortunate enough that the newer books that I have purchased I do not have the same problem, as I make it a point to actually get to know the person in question before I actually commit to dropping my hard earned dollars on their product and I have not been disappointed whatsoever.
I really do loathe in not finishing a given book that I have acquired, either temporarily (library) or outright purchased (new or used), because I'm of the mindset that if I had taken the time to acquire said book, then I need to read it to the bitter end, a literary twist on the sunk cost fallacy if you will. I'm pretty sure that I applied this theory to music as well.
Pivoting back to the written word. The scary thing about my DNF pile is that it's almost exclusively non-fiction that I ultimately have issues with. It's very rare for a fiction book to make my pile, although a few have made it in the past forty odd years, which have been scattered across all genres.
I think in general, my one saving grace is that I'm not spending oodles of money on the gently used books purchased and that the money being spent goes to a very good cause. So if I don't like the book in question, it ultimately makes a very fine visual addition to my bookshelf that screams "look how well read I am!", which is a tiny white lie that I'm willing to live with.
So my dear reader, do you force yourself to finish a book that you eventually found unappealing, just to justify the amount of money (or if you're a library patron, time and effort) spent to acquire the book to begin with? Or do you simply stop and place the book in an area of your bookshelf that holds all of the books that, for one reason or another, became a cherished member of the DNF, never to darken your field of vision every again?
{c} 2025 by G.B. Miller. All Rights Reserved